Speaking Freely
Posted April 26, 2008 - 10:41am by John Himpe
We recently started moderating comments on the News Talk websites. In fact, it's been about three or four weeks since we started the practice.
Why?
Well... it wasn't a reactionary measure. It wasn't provoked by some 'incident'.
It was in an effort to become better stewards of facilitating discussion. It was in an effort to ensure the comment threads don't get overrun with Spam for Viagra. It was in an effort to - because we deal with sensitive, topical stories and comments - ensure that all posts fall within the lines of good taste (no swearing), community standards (no hate speech or racist remarks), and the law.
So where is the line? How free is the speech on our site?
Like going to a private club that has a dress code, or going to a rink to watch your kid play hockey, this site has some house rules. The first is expressed quite clearly in our Terms of Service.
Rawlco shall have the right, but not the obligation, to monitor the content of the Site, including chat rooms and forums, to determine compliance with this Terms of Service and any operating rules established by Rawlco and to satisfy any law, regulation or authorized government request. Rawlco shall have the right in its sole discretion to edit, refuse to post or remove any material submitted to or posted on the Site without your permission. Without limiting the foregoing, Rawlco shall have the right to remove any material that we, in our sole discretion, find to be in violation of the provisions hereof or otherwise objectionable.
This isn't some Orwellian measure... this isn't in an effort to quash free speech... this is pretty much the same Terms of Service you'll find at pretty much every other credible site like news sites and major blog sites.
While unexpressed until now, I've been using a number of measuring sticks to determine whether or not a comment goes live. They are simple in concept... and pretty common sense. What gets your remarks booted?
- Glib, one-line pot shots that are more about trolling than actually advancing the discussion get nuked. We're here for mature, grown up talk and not... um... juvenile behaviour you're going to hear in a school ground.
- Use of language that is offensive. Comments like, "you are total useless, ignoramus assholes," (excerpt from a real comment, btw) will likely result in your comment getting stuck in moderation, and having your privileges to comment revoked. Same goes for hateful or racist comments.
- Comments which contain unconfirmed facts. "Well, my brother told me his best friend said that (insert politician's name here) was seen walking in to a no-tell motel the other night with a woman that wasn't his wife." That's nice... but we're not going to explore that here. Consider this one deleted. We're in the business of hearing what you have to think about things... not publishing libelous statements. If you think you have a real scoop... call the newsroom.
Again, think of this like a private club. It is our house... it is our rules. We have 'the hammer', but we hate using it. We hate using it because we wish people would be more mature.
In a world with services like Blogger and Typepad... if you really feel compelled to publish those comments that don't clear moderation... you have ways to do it. But you won't be doing it from our site.
To make it as cliche as possible... there are some good general ways to think about our take on commenting.
- Don't say something you wouldn't say in front of your grandmother.
- Don't say something you wouldn't say to someone's face.
- Say what you mean and mean what you say.
You get my drift.
So... comment away! But please... remember that speaking freely comes with responsibility. Consider this an outline of what that responsibility is.
John Himpe is Program Director of Rawlco Interactive and is a regular blog contributor to NewsTalk980.com and NewsTalk650.com.


Hey John
Coming from someone who has actually had a post disaproved, (I thought it was funny, apparently it wasn't), I will give you my trust, and support in your moderating duties.
Newstalk radio, lets face it, plays to their demographic, which at this time I would guess is white, male and Conservative. Still, you have let my opinions, which for the most part are anti-Tory, stand. (They make it so easy.) All except the one you pulled. (Really, I can't remember what the post was about, but I do remember that it was funny.) And lets face it. If everything that was written on here was Conservative drivel, it would be a dull, boring site. It's good to have some 'lefties' posting. (Although I am more of a centralist.) Lots of 'lefties' appeared during the Tammy Robert debacle. Let's have more.
Keep up the good work John. Rage against the machine! Rage against the machine! (Even if the 'machine' is someone who learned how to drive down on the farm.)
GO HABS!!
Dude, I hate to break it to
Dude, I hate to break it to you, but you are NOT a "centralist". You are as far left wing as I am right wing. It only appears that you are more in the middle because of all those kooks out in left field. But since you are willing to debate in a mature reasoned manner, you're ok. And you do have good hockey sense.
GO HABS!!
Me a lefty???
Geeze, does that mean I have to sell my truck, buy a Smart Car, (or a Prius), and hug a tree?
As far left as you think I am, I will NEVER vote for Jack Layton!
And you know what? Some of my best friends are.......
We sucked last night. I hope we turn it around for game three.
I said you are out on the
I said you are out on the left wing, not out in left field. And what do you have against Smart Cars? They are an intelligent solution for road congestion as well as conserving our resources. The hybrids on the other hand is an environmental disaster waiting to happen. It's just that their damage all happens before the car leaves the lot.
And is it just me or is Layton smiling a little too much for someone who must know he'll never win more seats than the Bloc?
Go Habs!!!
Dinorock
Dinorock:
I'm a 23 year old female who considers myself to be far more left-wing than right-wing. I am white, though, so I guess I do fit one out of the three stereotypes you used to describe the people who read the blogs on Rawlco's site and listen to the station's various programs. I can't stand the idea of "like sticking with like" so to speak, which is why I'm open to listening to and reading commentary that may not necessarily jive with my own opinions.
Thats great Jules. (And it
Thats great Jules. (And it doesn't hurt to stir the pot once in a while!)
Actually I probably shouldn't have included men in my demographic profile, but I make no apology in saying that news-talk does pander to the Conservative view. Having said that, I love it when David Kirkton, or Murray Wood goes against the grain. And yes, without differing opinions life would be pretty bland.
you say that we have the
you say that we have the hammer, as in rawlco radio. that is very nice but in truth do you not have the hammer? i quote " here are some.... i've been using". while i agree with the rules i have a problem with one person having the hammer. the same person who also writes some of the most heated and open to discussion blogs.here in lies the problem,how does one know why a comment is not allowed on, how will we know that some one has a good post that you do not like and therefore is gone. perception is reality and there are those who will believe this . what i am saying is who polices the police in this case.
Fair comment, hill3.
Fair comment, hill3. However, the fact is that my blog and my job are two separate things.
My blog is a place for my opinion... I post because I am a somewhat-recurring commentator on the station.
My job, however, encompasses development, design, and operations of all the websites across the Rawlco Radio universe. The rules mentioned above are the same rules that we employ with all our sites. Part of my job is to use those rules and moderate the site.
I am able to separate my blog from my job. One is creative outlet for me as a commentator... the other pays my bills. You'll have to trust that I know and understand which one is more important.
Good question and fair comment, though.
- John