Body of Lies --- review by Craig the Movie Geek!
Sound Off!
Sound off in Comments
Share This Blog Post
Can't see the 'ShareThis' icon? Reload your page view by pressing Shift and clicking Refresh at the same time.
Dir: Ridley Scott Stars: Leonardo DiCaprio, Russell Crowe, Mark Strong
Synopsis: Based on a book by a Washington Post columnist, Body of Lies is the story of a CIA operative who uncovers a lead on a major terrorist leader suspected to be operating out of Jordan.
First of all --- I can't believe Beverly Hills Chihuahua took the number one spot again this week. I totally underestimated the appeal of that movie. I still don't get it. Has anyone seen it? Why? And was it actually any good?
Anyway, back to Body of Lies. Here's my thought on Ridley Scott. He's only made two good movies --- Alien and Blade Runner. Though he's an extremely proficient director, I can just never bring myself to love any of his movies (besides the beforemention two). Gladiator is a great example. It looks amazing and has some great scenes, but it's such a generic movie that it just never comes together for me. I know that Gladiator won the Oscar, and I'm guessing a lot of people will disagree with me on that one, but I just can't get beside that movie. Especially after watching HBO's "Rome", an infinitely better take on that whole period.
Body of Lies falls into that too generic to dig category for me as well. As with Gladiator, the movie looks amazing, and it's technically sound. The acting is stellar --- Crowe and DiCaprio are both great (though I can't say the same for Leo's facial hair --- I believe that he believes it's real, so that's good acting!). Mark Strong, who was also in the new Guy Ritchie movie "Rocknrolla" has a tour de force performance. This is an actor to watch.
All that nice stuff being said --- the script just isn't strong enough, and maybe that's always the problem with Ridley Scott movies. He's content to direct, but doesn't pay enough attention to the actual material he's shooting. The movie is a mishmash of convoluted events and situations --- it doesn't take long before you realize that you have no idea what's going on. There is a romantic subplot that is totally tacked on. You're to believe that Leo and his leading lady must risk their lives to be together, but the movie never gives you a reason why they are together. They don't have any meaningful conversations at all.
Overly slick without proper handling of substance, the movie feels both silly and pretentious most of the time. It reminded me of a bad Jason Bourne knock off.
2 Dorks out of 5 on the Geek-o-Meter!



Comments
Personally, I'm a huge fan
Personally, I'm a huge fan of Ridley Scott. I think that people give him far too little credit for how proficient a director he is. "Alien" and "Blade Runner" are both amazing films and landmarks in Science Fiction. I love "Gladiator" and "Kingdom of Heaven" (The director's cut is brilliant. One of the best Crusade films). Last year's "American Gangster" was also really good. It's no "GoodFellas" or "The Godfather", but it doesn't try to be. It seems more like "The French Connection" or the Blaxploitation films of the 70's. Even "Matchstick Men" and "Thelma & Louise" are great watches. Of course he has made some bad movies, "A Good Year", "Legend" to name a few, but he's made enough good ones to be named an A-List director. Now in the case of "Body of Lies", I liked it quite a bit. It could be that I'm a sucker for films that are technically amazing: acting, cinematography, sound. Scott can't make a movie that doesn't look good. But I personally bought into the plot. Roger Ebert brought up the fact that this is a film with a completely implausible plot line, but it's handled in such a way that Scott made me buy it. I was never sitting there after a scene occurred saying, "What's the chances of that?" or "What the hell?". The film never gave me the opportunity to do that because it kept throwing new plot points at you. Ultimately, I can understand if you don't dig Scott and this film didn't work for you, but I feel like it is more a matter of taste than of quality. This is not a poorly made film. It's like "Syriana" with gun fights. I loved "Syriana". I liked "Body of Lies". But then again, I'm a big fan of 80's thrillers, and this feels a lot like one of them.
Great review. You are so
Great review. You are so right about Ridley Scott. Both he and Tony Scott are hacks, though hacks that know how to make things look slick!
I agree with the geek:
I agree with the geek: Ridley Scott is a hack. I'll give you Matchstick Men, but what's the point of having a top notch director if the rest of the movie stinks. Why not have a good director with a good script, like say, PT Anderson or something? Syriana was confusing on purpose to make a point. Body of Lies was just poorly written.
Kingdom of Heaven is one of
Kingdom of Heaven is one of the worst movies ever.
Add New Comment